Oneness of Allah free essay sample

None has the right to be worshipped but He, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. † [Surah Aal-‘Imran 3:18]. An eminent poet has elucidated his thoughts in a meaningful poem: In everything, there is a sign, Which proves to the unity of Allah Wondering then: How can people disobey God? Or how can a denier reject God? To Allah, in every move, And in every halt always a witness. The following aspects offer a wider perspectives and plain in proving the unity and Oneness of Allah: (1) The natural phenomena (2) Different aspects of divine laws. (3) The rationale of life (4) Logic or common sense. 5) Reaching to conclusion from the Names and Attributes of Allah. These aspects clearly prove the existence of Allah and exemplify the three basic concepts of Islamic Monotheism (Oneness of Allah), as mentioned earlier, which correlate with one another. Therefore, ascribing partner with Allah in any one of the three above-mentioned concepts, is tantamount to committing polytheism in all other concepts as well. We will write a custom essay sample on Oneness of Allah or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page For instance, If a person seeks Dua’a (supplication) from other than Allah is considered a kind of worship and clearly an act of Shirk or polytheism with Allah in His worship. In this context, invoking others (persons or things) than Allah is like seeking their intermediation and believing that they (intermediaries) can interfere and recommend to Allah on behalf of the supplicant and fulfill his/her requirements. This is completely an act of shirk or polytheism and tantamount to ascribing partner(s) with Allah, the Lord (Rabb) of the Universe. Moreover, a supplicant who assumes that others besides Allah also possessed the power of hearing and seeing and could answer his/her invocation (Du aa) is considered as an act of shirk (polytheism) as regards to Names and Attributes of Allah. First, it is a gross violation of divine laws to supplicate others than Allah. In no way this act is acceptable in Islam. Moreover, it is an act of Shirk (polytheism) if a person believing that with whom he/she engaged in supplication other than Allah can listen to him/her no matter whether faraway or closer. It is, therefore, considered as a major act of Shirk (polytheism) with Allah in His worship as associating or correlating someone or something with Names and Attributes of Allah, Who is the Lord (Rabb) of the universe. This is the reason that Allah has reiterated in the noble Qur’an encouraging people to ponder about the signs of Allah. Many verses in the Qur’an have explained focusing on this point. It is because, more the man used to ponder thinking about the signs of Allah the more he comes close to the truth. Furthermore, he would be more fearful of Allah to have Taqwah and tended adhere His commandments. The thinkers and intellectuals, who sought the path of the truth, therefore, reached unwaveringly to embrace Islam without fail. History has recorded many such events in the Pre-Islamic Ignorance era. The renowned intellectuals and poets of that period vehemently admitted and wholeheartedly declared that Allah is One though the society they lived in at that time was fully surrounded with polytheists and infidels. The most notorious intellectuals and prominent poets from among the ancient Arabs included Quss bin Saa’edat al-Eyadi and Zayd bin ‘Amr bin Nufail, who was the father of Sa’ied bin Zayd and the uncle of ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab. Quss bin Saa’edat in his famous address which he delivered in the Souq ‘Okaz( ), said: â€Å"O people! Listen and be conscious! Whoever lives would die, and whoever dies would be lost. Whoever be the newcomer would definitely show up. The night is dark and the day is calm and quiet. The heaven is holding the big stars, the stars are shining, and the seas are swelling up and surging. The mountains are toughening with the earth, which is flattened. The rivers are flowing along. In the heaven, there is definitely a message and on the earth, there is a lesson that which has to be taken into consideration. What about the people who passed, why don’t they comeback? Did they satisfied with where they stood and stayed therein? Or did they abandon so there they slept? He continued. He swore by the name of Allah, which is the legal swearing that Allah s religion (Islam) is the most satisfactory and most virtuous than your religion. You people are committing evil practices, he told the people then begun reciting poem: Among the earlier people who passed away- In the centuries, we have thoughtful lessons. When I have seen resources- For the nation, that has no origins. I have seen my people towards that- Walking both old and young The past will neither return to me- Nor of the rest bygone. I have ascertained by all means That I shall be wherewith the people have gone in the past. Zayd bin ‘Amr in his famous poem said: I have submitted my face to whom surrendered- Him the earth, which carries the heavy rocks He spread the earth, when He strengthened its tightening perfectly- Complete and He fixed the mountains on it firmly. I have submitted my face to whom surrendered- The rain clouds which carries sweet fresh- pure cold water. Thereupon, it was brought to a country- Which subservient to Him and poured on it with contest. Another ancient Arabian poet, (probably Umayyat bin Abi As-Salt), said: Only one Lord or thousand lords- Whom I should incriminate when the matters are distributed I have deserted Al-Lat and Al-‘Uzza (idols of Quraish pagans) completely- Likewise, the tolerant with endurance would follow. Moreover, a great number of thinkers and western intellectuals have led to the divine truth. They ultimately embraced Islam after their relentless search and contemplation for the true guidance. There is a research book titled â€Å"Allah Is More Manifest In Scientific Time, written by a group of 30 eminent scholars of astrophysics. Also there is another reference book entitled â€Å"Men Cannot Stand Alone† written by Chrisi Moreson, the chief of Science Academy in New York. This book was translated into Arabic under the title: â€Å"Science urges To the Divine Faith†. These books have commented saying that the true scholar should be a true believer. A commoner should also be a true believer. The mediocre type of scholars, who are less learned, should be an atheist and an unbeliever. In other words, such a scholar would be from among the little learned person. Therefore, he lost the natural inclination of true belief in the Islamic Monotheism while he never tries to reach to the knowledge that brings him to the true divine faith. Such mediocre type scholars should endeavor to search the knowledge for the true belief in order to achieve ultimate happiness in this life and the Hereafter. However, from all the above-mentioned evidences any rationale and sound mind reaches to a point that enables him/her to natural inclination for the acceptance of Oneness of Allah. Meantime, if anyone denies the above evidences, this means he/she still has to overcome weaknesses of his/her mind. It is because of the poor understanding he/she fails to comprehend the natural truth. What one poet has said is true in this regard! If your mind urges you to deny Him (i. . Allah’s unity)- Then reject your mind and its claim. This makes it obvious to a claim that the universe was created by coincidence or that the nature itself was a Creator, stands false. Raising such kind of claims and doubts only prove the arrogance and inflexibility of a mind which go counter to the soundness of brain and tends to deny the authenticity of the divine evidences. If anyone argues based on his/her assumption that the creation of this universe was just a coincidence then such a person should be asked: If the running of affairs of such a vast universe and its systematic sustenance is also coincidence? In this context, Wahiduddin Khan, an Indian Islamic scholar in his writings on the subject has quoted a statement of an American scholar Mr. Chrisi Morison, who challenged the creation of universe as being the coincidence. To substantiate his statement Morison narrated in detail the example of coins (Dirhams). He said take 10 Dirhams and mark them with numbers from one to 10. After marking, mix the coins by putting them into the pocket or a box. The next step he said is to pick the coins, one at a time, from the pocket or a box. Each coin so picked, he said should be in the numerical sequence, from one to 10. This means, in the first attempt the coin marked with number one should be picked followed by two, three and up to 10. He clarified saying that the numerical sequence is possible only when in the first attempt itself the coin marked with number one is picked and the rest in the similar order in different attempts. However, he challenged saying it is not possible to pick coins consecutively forming the sequence even after hundreds and thousands of attempts. The chances of success to pick the coins in numerical sequence are simply impossible, he noted saying even if attempts are made one after another and that is continued, might be for billions of times. On the analogy of this example, he said that how many attempts did it take, therefore, to create this universe even if it’s assumed that the creation of the universe is a coincidence? It is impossible to even imagine the computing of number of attempts each time a coin is picked to achieve the numerical order leave alone conceptualizing the idea. It would be a totally unrealistic counting, he noted.